i'm holding onto a fairytale

jessie. toronto. photography. concerts. harry potter. sherlock. tv. films. don't take this place too seriously.
flickr
photo blog
facebook
→ Ask me anything
butitlookslikefun:

aanubis:

vondell-swain:

thelastsamweiss:

vondell-swain:

whoa
i love it

um
anyone else understand what the fuck this is supposed to mean
i just don’t get art sometimes
i really don’t
this is bullshit

it’s an installation piece that tells a familiar, immediately-identifiable story (that of the roughly, carelessly handled package) while simultaneously housing a handful of incredibly interesting ideas. the package was shipped with the full intent of it being handled carelessly, returned and presented as art — completely unbeknownst to the employees, who proceeded to treat it exactly as they would treat a package that did not contain “art”.
that indifference says a lot of things about how absolutely arbitrary the “value” we give to art is, and also poses some interesting questions about when exactly something begins to be classified as art — is it when the piece is planned? is it when the piece is shipped? is it when the piece arrives at the gallery? is it when the show opens?
if you happened across this piece sitting in a warehouse full of glass showcases, it wouldn’t be a piece at all, it would just be an unfortunate error waiting to be thrown away. if you happened across it in a FedEx warehouse, you’d reprimand the employee responsible and toss it. if you happened across it when it was outside the gallery waiting to be brought in, you’d assume the gallery owner would be very annoyed that one of the glass showcases they ordered broke and they’d have to order another one.
in fact, it is the very action of presenting it as a piece of art and opening it up for critical interpretation that defines it as art. that is the action that gives value to these two objects. it allows their story to be told by allowing you to experience it and consider it in an elevated, critical manner that you otherwise would never have done.
it’s a very high-concept piece and so it takes a lot more mental investment in order to understand and appreciate than, say, a pretty painting of a landscape would. but once you do, it’s a very nice treat. I enjoyed it.
(it also happens to be really really pleasing aesthetically, which I’m sure played a large part in the conceptual refinement and physical planning stage after the inception of the original concept. the decision to have the case be cube-shaped and not rectangular was a particularly well-considered decision that adds a lot to the final product.)

BITCHES GOT REPRIMANDED 

New goal: I’m going to learn how to be this articulate with my speaking words and throw out eloquent answers to “um what” questions I get at the gallery. 

butitlookslikefun:

aanubis:

vondell-swain:

thelastsamweiss:

vondell-swain:

whoa

i love it

um

anyone else understand what the fuck this is supposed to mean

i just don’t get art sometimes

i really don’t

this is bullshit

it’s an installation piece that tells a familiar, immediately-identifiable story (that of the roughly, carelessly handled package) while simultaneously housing a handful of incredibly interesting ideas. the package was shipped with the full intent of it being handled carelessly, returned and presented as art — completely unbeknownst to the employees, who proceeded to treat it exactly as they would treat a package that did not contain “art”.

that indifference says a lot of things about how absolutely arbitrary the “value” we give to art is, and also poses some interesting questions about when exactly something begins to be classified as art — is it when the piece is planned? is it when the piece is shipped? is it when the piece arrives at the gallery? is it when the show opens?

if you happened across this piece sitting in a warehouse full of glass showcases, it wouldn’t be a piece at all, it would just be an unfortunate error waiting to be thrown away. if you happened across it in a FedEx warehouse, you’d reprimand the employee responsible and toss it. if you happened across it when it was outside the gallery waiting to be brought in, you’d assume the gallery owner would be very annoyed that one of the glass showcases they ordered broke and they’d have to order another one.

in fact, it is the very action of presenting it as a piece of art and opening it up for critical interpretation that defines it as art. that is the action that gives value to these two objects. it allows their story to be told by allowing you to experience it and consider it in an elevated, critical manner that you otherwise would never have done.

it’s a very high-concept piece and so it takes a lot more mental investment in order to understand and appreciate than, say, a pretty painting of a landscape would. but once you do, it’s a very nice treat. I enjoyed it.

(it also happens to be really really pleasing aesthetically, which I’m sure played a large part in the conceptual refinement and physical planning stage after the inception of the original concept. the decision to have the case be cube-shaped and not rectangular was a particularly well-considered decision that adds a lot to the final product.)

BITCHES GOT REPRIMANDED 

New goal: I’m going to learn how to be this articulate with my speaking words and throw out eloquent answers to “um what” questions I get at the gallery. 

(Source: p1ss, via sealegslegssea)

  2:34 am  |   February 1 2012   |  7,954 notes  

  1. app--tumb reblogged this from goemon552
  2. peroraniente liked this
  3. cemetery4nerves liked this
  4. nonesmadurr liked this
  5. bangage reblogged this from decrux
  6. fidgefingers reblogged this from eddplant
  7. ifyourenotlost liked this
  8. arrjcc reblogged this from johnnychallenge
  9. trevor-myrick reblogged this from confessionsofamichaelstipe and added:
    The UMFA owns one of these. I must see it.
  10. asweetandtenderhooligan liked this
  11. mephist0philus reblogged this from lekkahfriki
  12. sillyreject liked this
  13. monbonamour liked this
  14. therevolutionthatfailed reblogged this from vondell-swain and added:
    Alternatively, someone wanted a glass box for their fish and FedEx broke it. They decided to take a picture to document...
  15. haxa reblogged this from p1ss
  16. run-runaway liked this
  17. thebyne reblogged this from confessionsofamichaelstipe
  18. little-four-leaves liked this
  19. srococo reblogged this from awomanking
  20. yongyeng reblogged this from harshyouth
  21. ktlb liked this
  22. sovietsiren reblogged this from republicoflabia and added:
    Yo… its art. No one gives a fuck if you like it or understand it. It’s art!!! Also… I don’t even wanna read what the...
  23. judge-dork reblogged this from republicoflabia and added:
    I accidentally philosophy all over your dash. Is that bad?
  24. judge-dork liked this
  25. republicoflabia reblogged this from clumsyspark
  26. clumsyspark reblogged this from effyeaharthistory
  27. lebasiana liked this
  28. dog-master liked this
  29. comfortablydoug liked this
  30. nukemenukeme liked this
  31. northernwhale liked this
  32. mitromanu reblogged this from confessionsofamichaelstipe
  33. goemon552 liked this
  34. goemon552 reblogged this from bakedroy
  35. cloyacco reblogged this from johnnychallenge
  36. bakedroy liked this
  37. bakedroy reblogged this from johnnychallenge
  38. johnnychallenge reblogged this from pipco
  39. redb reblogged this from xsxtxaxtxixcxsxhxoxxx
  40. maenomeri reblogged this from pipco
  41. rcglasses reblogged this from effyeaharthistory
  42. tmkj1 reblogged this from pipco
  43. superknockout liked this
  44. zakio reblogged this from pipco
  45. infinity-d reblogged this from pipco
  46. unimogroove reblogged this from pipco
  47. horrorandglamour liked this
  48. gnarlybr02k12 reblogged this from xsxtxaxtxixcxsxhxoxxx
  49. mobaby liked this
  50. Show more notesLoading...
Back   |   Next
Made with ❤.